Writing Tips from Professor Alves
|
Writing an introduction
|
Other writing tips:
|
The introduction to a paper is a very important section, in that it
sets the expectations of the reader. While there is no one formula for
a good introduction, in general, an introduction to a formal paper of this
type should include the following things:
- An introduction should grab the reader's attention. Magazine and
newspaper articles often accomplish this with brief but interesting anecdotes,
questions that pique the reader's curiosity, something of personal relevance
to the reader, or other apt quotations, provocative questions, or statements.
While you shouldn't feel that you have to sensationalize, neither should
you assume that the reader is interested in what you have to say by default.
Very often just raising the interesting issue that your thesis explores
is enough to pull your reader in.
- An introduction should tell the reader explicitly what the thesis (the
point of the paper) is. After having read the introduction, the reader
should have no doubt about what the central point of your paper is.
- An introduction should establish the significance of your point to the
reader. You should convince your audience that it should care about
what you have to say, though attention to relevance and significance is
part of constructing a successful thesis.
- An introduction should give a preview of how you are going to demonstrate
your thesis. You should be able to summarize in a brief list of three
or so points how you are going to back up your thesis, so as to prepare
the reader and improve the reader's recognition and retention of those
points.
Here are some things to watch out for in your introduction:
- An introduction is not the place to introduce background or factual
information. Unless some VERY brief information is necessary to understand
the terms or significance of the thesis, save the background for your next
paragraph.
- An introduction should not be too long. An introduction should be
a single paragraph, at least for the length of papers for this class. A
page-long intro is far too long -- half a page or less is good. If your
opening anecdote is a long one, you don't have to finish it in the introduction
-- just introduce enough of it to get the reader's attention and establish
the significance of your thesis. You can finish it in the body of the paper.
(In fact, such a "teaser" is a common device of newspaper feature writers.)
- Don't start your introduction with a dictionary definition. We're
not interested in how Webster's defines "surrealism." We are interested
in YOUR take on it.
- Don't start out with a grand generalization. Showing the significance
of your thesis does not mean that you have to demonstrate its importance
in the entire history of art or tie it to some universal observation.
Your second paragraph will often connect the opening anecdote or statement
to the rest of the paper, providing a transition from your generalized
introduction to your detailed look at your first point. It is also a common
technique to refer back to your opening in your conclusion, providing a
satisfying closure to the paper.
Here are two examples:
| The explosion of fist fights, police action, jeers,
and cheers that greeted the notorious 1913 premiere of Igor Stravinsky's
The Rite of Spring is now famous as the screaming birth of musical
modernism. Stuckenschmidt says that the dissonance
percussiveness, and savagery of the score were unlike anything the public
had heard to that time (67), and this premiere became a symbol of
the uncompromising new musical language that refused to pander to prettiness
or sentimentality. However, contrary to Stuckenschmidt's and other conventional
interpretations, I believe that The Rite of Spring
was a last gasp of Romanticism rather than the birth of modernism,
as shown in its unreserved drama and spectacle, its
heritage of Russian nationalism, and its idealization of "primitive" man. |
| Here the author grabs the reader's attention. |
|
| Though citations are not typically used in
an introduction, the author here uses one to establish a controversy and
hence the significance of the thesis. |
|
|
| Here the author states the thesis in an unambiguous
way. |
|
| Here the author gives a preview of the three
points he will make to support his thesis. |
|
| In 1901, Pablo Picasso's closest friend, Carlos
Casagemas, committed suicide, an event which shocked the young artist and
drove him into a deep, guilt-laden depression. Indeed,
in the aftermath of this tragedy, Picasso became superstitious in his fear
of anything associated with death, an obsession which was reflected not
just in his subsequent "blue period" paintings, but throughout his life.
The painting Picasso executed in response to Casagemas'
death, paradoxically titled La Vie [Life] (1903), develops
several of the distinctive motives that would become important to his later
paintings, including his ambivalent view of
women, a close connection between sex and death, and an intensely subjective
viewpoint. |
| Here is an interesting anecdote to capture
the reader's attention. The details of the story can wait until the next
paragraph. |
|
| Here the author makes clear the significance
of the story. The reader should be interested in this event not just because
of an idle curiosity about Picasso's life, but because of how it shaped
his art. |
|
| Now the author clearly states the thesis... |
|
| and gives a preview of the points that will
support the thesis. |
|
|