| This page contains a collection
of images related to the research projects in the lab. |
||
| Home |
Quick Links |
|
| Projects |
HMC Zimbra Mail |
|
| Drewell Lab
Figures |
Biology Department |
|
| Publications |
BDGP |
|
| Homeotic
Genes and Segment Identity |
FlyBase |
|
| Links |
NCBI |
|
| Genomic Imprinting and Regulation |
PubMed |
|
| Images |
BLASTn |
|
| Geneimprint.com |
||
| Drewell
Lab |
Yahoo |
|
| Office - 909-607-2670 Lab
- 909-607-1793 Fax - 909-607-7172
E-mail - drewell@hmc.edu |
Google |
|
|
|
|
|
Intergenic transcription at the abdA-AbdB locus. (A) Summary of abdA-AbdB locus. The abdA and AbdB transcription start sites are indicated by leftward arrows. The intergenic region is 100 kb in length. The iab regions that control expression of the two Hox genes are indicated (IAB2 to IAB8). IAB2, IAB3, and IAB4 (shown in green) regulate expression of abdA. IAB5, IAB6, IAB7, and IAB8 (shown in yellow) direct AbdB expression. The insulator DNAs that separate the different iab regions are indicated (black ellipses). The presumptive Fab6 insulator (gray ellipse) has yet to be identified. Characterized enhancers within the iab regions are shown as blue rectangles. The locations of probes used for in situ hybridization analysis in this study are shown as black bars under the locus. (B–I) Transcription patterns detected with in situ hybridization probes. Embryos are orientated with anterior to the left and dorsal up. Probes against the abdA (B and C) and AbdB (F and G) coding regions detect the expected distribution of transcripts (see text). An APP probe detects transcription at blastoderm stage 5 (D) and later in development (E), unlike a BPP probe, which detects transcription in abdominal segments 8 and 9 only later in embryonic development (H and I). |
||
|
Transcription in the iab regions. (A) The location of probes at the abdA-AbdB locus. (B–M) Patterns of sense transcription detected by in situ hybridization RNA probes. At stage 5, transcripts from the different iab regions show distinct distribution patterns along the A–P axis of the embryo. A probe from the iab3 region detects expression (B) extending farther toward the anterior of the embryo than iab4 (E). Expression patterns become increasingly restricted toward the posterior of the embryo in the iab5 region (H) and iab8 region (K). From stage 9 of development, transcription from all iab regions is restricted to the two most posterior abdominal segments, 8 and 9 (C, F, I, and L). This pattern persists through stage 13 of development (D, G, J, and M). |
||
|
Temporal activation of sense iab transcripts. (A) At late stage 4 in embryos hybridized with probes against engrailed and iab4s transcripts, expression is detected only in the posterior iab4 domain, before the appearance of anterior engrailed expression. (B) In early blastoderm stage 5 embryos, sense transcripts can be detected in the iab4 domain and the anterior engrailed stripe 2. (C) Colinear distribution of transcripts in the iab regions. Measure of transcript distribution is shown as a percentage of embryo length. The anterior tip of the embryo corresponds to 0 and the posterior tip corresponds to 100. The probes are listed according to their order on the chromosome, with the exception of probes against the two Hox genes, Aexon (green) and Bexon (yellow), which are shown at the bottom and the top of graph, respectively. Colinearity between the chromosomal order of probes and their transcription patterns is observed. The anterior limits of transcription for probes from the iab5, iab6, iab7, and iab8 regions are restricted within the AbdB domain of expression (pale yellow), whereas probes from iab3 and iab4 regions detect patterns extending into the abdA expression domain (pale green). The distribution of the antisense transcripts detected in iab4 and iab6 are also colinear with their chromosomal locations and are shown in black. |
||
|
Antisense transcripts in the iab regions. (A–D) Sense transcription pattern at iab4 region during embryonic development detected by probe 4-5. No transcript is detectable at stage 5 (A). Transcription is detectable at stage 8 and, by stage 9, is restricted to abdominal segments 8 and 9. Transcription persists in the two most posterior abdominal segments through stage 13 (D). (E–H) The iab4as transcript (23) also is detected by probe 4-5, although the pattern is distinct from that of sense transcription. At blastoderm stage 5, the antisense transcript is expressed strongly in the iab4 domain (E) and persists in abdominal segments 1–7 through developmental stages 8 (F), 9 (G), and 13 (H), but is excluded from the most posterior segments. The distributions of the iab4as and iab4 sense transcripts appear to be mutually exclusive. (I and J) A novel antisense transcript is detected by probe 6-1. At blastoderm stage 5, the transcript is restricted to the iab6 domain (I) and, by stage 9, is expressed strongly in abdominal segments 4, 5, and 6 and more weakly in 7, 8, and 9 (J). The sense transcription detected by probe 6-1 (data not shown) is mutually exclusive to the iab6as pattern. |
||
|
Cellular localization of BX-C transcripts. (A) Summary of abdA-AbdB locus. The abdA and AbdB transcription start sites are indicated by leftward arrows. The intergenic region is 100 kb in length. The iab regions that control expression of the two Hox genes are indicated (IAB2 to IAB8). IAB2, IAB3, and IAB4 (shown in green) regulate expression of abdA. IAB5, IAB6, IAB7, and IAB8 (shown in yellow) direct AbdB expression. The insulator DNAs (black ellipses) separate the different iab regions. The presumptive Fab6 insulator has yet to be identified (gray ellipse). Characterized enhancers within the iab regions are shown as blue rectangles. The location of probes used for in situ hybridization analysis in this study are shown as black bars under the locus. Sense transcripts (s), relative to the direction of AbdB transcription, are detected by antisense probes, and antisense transcripts (as) are detected by sense probes. (B and C) iab6as expression pattern at the surface of blastoderm stage 5 embryos. Hybridization to the transcripts appears uniform throughout the cells in which they are expressed. (D and E) Sense transcripts from the IAB8 enhancer sequence are visible as discrete foci in the cells at the surface of blastoderm stage 5 embryos (D). At higher magnification, two foci can be seen in each expressing cell at the focal plane (E). (F and G) AbdB expression in stage 9 embryos visualized by confocal microscopy. The transcript (red) is excluded predominantly from the nucleus (green) and distributed throughout the cellular cytoplasm (G). (H and I) IAB8 sense transcripts (red) are localized at the nuclear periphery and not distributed in the cytoplasm of the cell (I). |
||
|
Mcp
genomic region regulates transcription. (A–H) Intergenic transcription
is blocked at insulator DNAs. (A) Genomic Mcp region. The 3-kb deletion
in the Mcp mutant (28) is shown between the iab4 (green) and iab5 (yellow)
regulatory regions. The locations of expected RT-PCR products and in situ
hybridization probes are shown below the line. (B–G) Transcription across
the Mcp insulator sequence detected by in situ hybridization. In blastoderm
stage 5 embryos, sense transcripts can be detected in the iab4 region (4-2;
B) and, in the characterized Mcp sequence (MCP-2; F), with the transcription
pattern at MCP-2 restricted farther toward the posterior of the embryo. No
transcription is detected from probe MCP-4 (D), which maps adjacent to the
characterized Mcp sequence early in development. All three probes detect
expression in the posterior abdominal segments at stage 9 (C, E, and G). (H)
RT-PCR detection of transcription at insulator sequences. PCR amplifications
were performed in parallel on reverse-transcribed total RNA (RT) and genomic
DNA (gDNA) from 0- to 4-h embryos. Transcription could be detected with primer
pairs within the characterized Mcp element (MCP-2 and MCP-3) and the iab4
region (4-1), but not at the intervening MCP-4 sequence. No product was detected
from the RT cDNA sample when amplified from MCP-3 to MCP-4 or from MCP-4
to 4-1, suggesting that the iab4 (4-1) and Mcp (MCP2/3) transcripts are
not joined. However, transcription could be detected with primers from MCP-2
into MCP-3, suggesting that they are part of the same transcription unit.
No product was detected from 6-2 to 5-1, although these sequences are transcribed
independently, indicating that transcription is blocked at the intervening
region. The expected size products were obtained with all primer pairs from
gDNA. Control lanes are RT– (absence of reverse transcriptase) for RT and
water for gDNA (–Control). (I–P) Mcp deletion results in disrupted transcription
in the iab4 region. (I) Mcp mutant phenotype. In contrast to wild-type adult
males, the A4 segment is pigmented in homozygous Mcp mutants (black arrow),
indicating that the fourth abdominal segment is transformed into a more posterior
abdominal segment. (J) PCR amplifications were performed in parallel on reverse-transcribed
total RNA from homozygous Mcp mutant (Mcp) and wild-type yw67 0- to 4-h embryos.
No transcription could be detected in the Mcp mutant with primer pairs
from the iab4 region (4-1 and 4-2), although the iab5 (5-1) and AbdB (Bexon)
transcripts are present. In contrast, transcription in the iab4 region
was readily detectable in wild-type embryos. Negative control lane is RT–.
(K–P) Transcription in Mcp mutant and yw67 embryos detected by in situ
hybridization with engrailed and iab4s probes. In blastoderm stage 5 embryos,
sense transcripts can be detected in the iab4 region and in the anterior
engrailed stripe pattern in yw67 embryos (L). The iab4s transcript is absent
in the Mcp mutant embryos (K). The transcription patterns detected at stages
9 and 13 in Mcp (M and O) and yw67 (N and P) are indistinguishable from
each other. |
||
|
Model of intergenic transcription-mediated enhancer activation. At the very early stages of embryonic development, the cis-regulatory elements (shown here as an enhancer, but also possible for Polycomb response elements) at the intergenic iab regions are inactive. A closed chromatin configuration prevents access to the trans factors (black circles), such as the products of the gap or segmentation genes, which are necessary to direct expression of the abdA and AbdB protein-coding genes (Gene X). Within each iab region, discrete anteroposterior patterns of transcription (black arrow) are initiated at around late stage 4/early stage 5 in development. RNA polymerase II (Pol II) and its associated remodeling complex (HAT, histone acetyltransferase) pass through the enhancer and epigenetically modify the histone tails (shown here as acetylation, but also may involve deacetylation, methylation, or demethylation of histone tail residues), creating an open chromatin configuration. Spreading of transcription from one iab region to the next is prevented by insulator DNAs (black ellipses) at the boundaries of each iab region. The newly modified open histones now permit the binding of trans factors to the enhancer sequence, and this stable interaction is able to direct segment-specific expression of the neighboring Hox genes from midstage 5 of development onward. |
||
| Homeotic genes control the further specialization
of larval segments. Bithorax and Antennapedia are two complexes of homeotic
genes in the fly's DNA. The genes in the bithorax complex and found
that the genes in the DNA are arranged in the same general order as their
expression pattern along the head-to-tail axis. |
|
|
|
In
the co-linearity principle, Edward B. Lewis also found that the genetic
expression domains overlap and that the first gene in the complex becomes
active a little earlier than the second and so on. This is indicated in
the figure by the black bars below the fly embryo. Later research showed
that the homeotic genes of the fly are homologous to homeotic genes in other
types of animals, including man.
|
|
A normal adult fruit fly, enlarged 40 times. To the right the fly's ill-fated cousin, a mutant with 4 wings but no balance organs. This now famous little "monster" was a starting point for research on homeotic transformations. The extra pair of wings was due to a duplication of an entire body segment, the 2nd thoracic segment. Inactivity of the first gene of the bithorax-complex in the appropriate larval segment caused other homeotic genes to respecify the 3rd thoracic segment into one that forms wings instead of halteres. |
|
|
|
The
Primitive Brain Segmentation of the back part of the primitive brain is visible in the nine rhombomeres. The HOX-B 2 gene is expressed in rhombomere 4, the HOX-B 3 gene in rhombomeres 5 and 6 and the HOX-B 4 gene in rhombomeres 7 and 8. If a HOX gene is lost the result is incorrect development of the rhombomeres concerned and - as a consequence of this - incorrect development of the branchial arches, neck or head structures. |
|
| Razor-sharp
Boundaries The blue color reveals the specific activity of two homeotic genes in mouse embryos. In figure A the HOX-D 2 gene is active earlier and nearer the embryo's head-end than the HOX-D 4 gene shown in figure B. In both cases there is a razor-sharp boundary at the upper end of the segment wheras gene activity is more diffuse further down. |
|
|
Normal mouse embryo
Retinoic acid - loss of vertebrae More
retinoic acid - no
posterior region formed |
Congenital
Malformations in Mouse and Man The HOX genes have important functions during the early development of the vertebrate embryo. Mutations in such important genes - or altering their expression patterns - may damage the embryonic development. Two of the three mouse embryos show malformations caused by high doses of vitamin A (retinoic acid), which was given to their mothers on day 8 of pregnancy. Vitamin A has caused the homeotic HOX genes 1-4 to become expressed in groups of cells that usually do not express these genes. It is well known that high doses of vitamin A taken by women early during pregnancy can disturb the regulation of HOX genes even in the human embryo and cause severe malformations. |
|
| Waardenburg's
Syndrome Mutations have been found in human genes related to those described for Drosophila. A defective human HOX gene related to the Drosophila gene paired will cause a condition known as Waardenburg's syndrome. It is a very rare disease, affecting one of 42 000 born children. It involves deafness, defects in the facial skeleton and altered pigmentation of the iris. |
|
|
|
Aniridia Aniridia, loss of the iris of the eye, seems to be caused by a defect in the homeotic gene PAX 6. It is a rare congenital disease. |
|
| The
Human Embryo The Human Embryo is, in its early stages, hard to distinguish from the embryo of a mouse, a rabbit or a giraffe. The human embryo is in fact segmented like the fruit fly larva according to a basic plan valid for all living things. The segments of the human embryo consist of somites, cell masses which develop into ribs, vertebrae and back muscles. |
|
|
| These images are based on material from
the 1995
Physiology or Medicine Nobel Poster. |
|
Normal development in mammals requires a genetic contribution from the mother (maternal) and father (paternal). In nuclear transplantation experiments, performed by Surani and Solter, the effect of having only maternal or paternal pronuclei was examined. In the case of maternal only the development of the embryo is relatively normal, but the placenta is underdeveloped. Two paternal pronuclei lead to abnormal embryonic development. These effects are due to functional differences between the parental genomes. There are imprinted genes which are only expressed from the maternal or paternal chromosome. |
|
|
Regulation of Mouse H19/Igf2 imprinted locus H19 is expressed only from the maternal allele, Igf2 only from the paternal allele. Characterized enhancers downstream of H19 (green circles) mediate expression in both endodermal and some mesodermal tissues. The Imprinting Control Region (ICR) at H19 acts as a silencer when the DNA is methylated on the paternal chromosome and as an insulator when unmethylated on the maternal chromosome. |
|
|
H19 ICR acts as a endoderm-specific silencer The wild-type (WT) pattern of H19 expression in day 13.5 embryos is concentrated in endoderm and mesoderm-derived tissues. The normal paternal allele (paternal WT) is transcriptionally silenced. Deletion of the H19 ICR results in reactivation of the paternal allele (Paternal SilK), but only in endodermal tissues. |
|
|
Model of methylation-dependent repression from the H19 ICR At the paternal H19 allele, DNA methylation (filled circles) at the Imprinting Control Region (ICR) is recognised by MeCP2. MeCP2 is capable of recruiting Sin3a and HDACs via its Transciptional Repression Domain (blue ellipse). HDACs act locally to deacetylate the tails of histones proximal to H19, resulting in chromatin compaction and silencing of the H19 gene. At the maternal H19 allele the absence of DNA methylation at the ICR prevents recruitment of the MeCP2/Sin3a/HDAC complex. The histones in the region therefore remain acetylated and the chromatin is accessible to factors necessary for transcription of the H19 gene. |
|
|
Enhancer
activity of the H19 Upstream Conserved (HUC) sequences in vivo A transgenic conctruct was introduced into mouse embryos. Two DNA elements, conserved in mouse and human from upstream of H19 (HUCs), were attached to a H19 promoter and reporter gene (PLAP). The HUC DNA sequences were able to drive expression of the reporter gene in mesodermal tissues in developing embryos. D, diaphragm; H, heart; K, kidney; M; Meckel’s cartilage; SC, spinal cartilage; T, tongue. Scale bar in B: 1 mm. |
|