Spring 2004
MWF 10 AM, Jacobs 132
Professor
Marianne de Laet
1259
Parsons
7-3812
http://www2.hmc.edu/~delaet/index.htm
course website
Course: There is a tendency to understand Europe as a homogenous place;
moreover, in the US we tend to look at Europe as the origin of science, art,
and cultural identity. But what is this thing we call Europe? How "European"
is Europe? And what does it mean to speak of culture and identity? In this
class we will explore elements of the European humanistic tradition (art,
philosophy, science, and technology) with an eye on the migration of thoughts
and things. Where do ideas come from? How do technologies travel? Is there
such a thing as a cultural identity? We will consider culture as a mixture
of influences, and trace "Europe" to the diverse ingredients of
which it is made.
Course
goals:
By the end of this semester you will have been exposed to current ideas about
identity, culture, and self. You will have developed a sense of how self and
identity form in cultural environments, and of how culture, identity and self
are expressed in cultural facts and artefacts. From our discussions about
such ideas and our exploratrions of cultural artefacts, you will have gained
analytical skills that allow you to think about self, culture, and cultural
diversity in an intelligent and sophisticated manner. You have honed your
research and writing skills in your efforts to execute such cultural analysis
in journals and term papers. Hopefully, by the end of the semester you will
be able to say that your writing and thinking have improved.
Writing:
This is
a writing-intensive class. You will be accumulating up to 100 points throughout
the semester. 90 points and more will get you a grade in the A range, 75-90
yields a grade in the B range, 60-75 in the C’s; below 55 you receive no credit.
NB in order to pass the class you MUST submit all three research papers
and at least 6 (out of 7) journal entries.
Journal max
5 points per journal; up to 30
2
short research papers (4-6 pages, 2 sources)
up to 15 points each
Long
research paper (10 pages, 5 sources)
up to 30 points
Presence 0
or 10 points
The
journal is an electronic response to the week’s class proceedings and
-content; your Word attachment or website address is due on Friday by 5 PM.
Your weekly entry should include a brief summary of what was done in each
of the class periods; the week’s writing assignments (if there were any);
and a brief, thoughtful, and intelligent response to
the readings and class discussions. The journal should be well-organized and
accessible. You can keep working on, and revising, journal entries until the
end of the semester; the complete journal should be printed out, and submitted
for grading on the last day of class. In determining the grade I will
take into account organization, comprehensiveness, thoughtful processing of
class readings and discussions, and writing mechanics and -style.
Short
research papers (4-6 pages, 2 references each; first drafts due for peer review 2/9 and
3/8; final drafts due 2/13 and 3/12)
In
the first essay you develop a cogent argument about a text or artefact we
have discussed in class. You may, alternatively, compare and contrast two
different approaches found in the literature. It is imperative that you develop
an independent argument that goes beyond the surface of the material we discuss
in class. For this paper you use as your sources
In
the second essay you may do one of two things: a. select a work of art and
“unpack” it – that is to say, discuss and analyze its cultural life; or b.
discuss the question “Does culture have politics?” In the first case, you
describe the object, place it in a context, and use use texts presented in
class to analyze the object’s cultural life. In the second case, you use class
materials and examples to develop a sustainable argument in support of your
answer to the question.
Research
essay (10
pages, 5 references, first draft due for peer review 4/21; final version due
4/28)
Advance
a thesis that is in any way related to the theme of this class: Unpacking
Europe. The paper should include your own argument, based on the discussion
of at least 5 sources; data from these sources serve to flesh out your topic
and to lend authority to your position. Documentation and bibliography should
follow an acknowledged reference format. A brief description of your topic
and a research plan are due 4/9 – these will be discussed in class; an annotated
bibliography and thesis are due 4/16; the first version of the research paper
is due for peer review on 4/23; and the final draft of the paper is due 4/30).
Missing any of these deadlines will cost you points.
In
all writing assignments you should keep in mind the following. You seek
to persuade your reader of your argument. Be certain that your thesis is interesting
and provocative; also be sure that you have the materials/information to support
it. Refer to Hacker A Writer's Reference (pp. 79-81) to refresh your
memory on how to start a research paper and craft a thesis. For your first
two (short) research essays you need not look for outside references to support
your arguments. You must, however, incorporate and refer to at least two of
the texts (articles/chapters) we read in class. References should conform
to an acknowledged style format (again, see Hacker). First drafts of essays
will be peer edited in class and are due 2/9 and 3/8.
Policies and rules of conduct: Attendance is mandatory, and late assignments
will not be accepted. However, if you have good reason for being late or not
present, and notify me in advance, I may excuse you. I take it as a given
that all class work is in accordance with the honors code. I can be reached
in person during office hours, by email or by phone. Outside office hours
you are welcome to stop by my office unannounced but there is a risk that
you will be asked to come back at a more convenient moment; it is best to
make an appointment. If you send email please do not expect an instant response;
it may take a day or two before I can get back to you. I do not always read
email on weekends, so make sure you relay urgent matters to me by the end
of the day on Friday. When in doubt about logistics or assignments, please
check the website before taking up valuable class or instructor time.
I
expect that you take an active role in the class proceedings, and that you
help me shape the classroom into a positive and encouraging learning environment.
This means that you participate in shaping class “content” – you should be ready to make quality contributions
to class discussions and exercises and be prepared in such a way that you
can lead a discussion at any time. But it also means that you take responsibility
for “process” – that is, you are an active participant from the moment you
enter the classroom; you are on time and your contributions are on topic;
your arguments are thoughtful and to the point; you are engaged with and respectful
of others’ arguments and points of view. I value your suggestions and welcome
your comments on the way we collaboratively run this class. Finally, I expect
that all interactions, including peer review and commentary on each other’s
work, will be conducted in a spirit of constructive collaboration and mutual
respect.
Course
Texts:
Jacques
Derrida Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness New York: Routledge 2001
Diana
Hacker A Writer’s Reference
Salah
Hassan & Iftikar Dadi Unpacking Europe. Towards a Critical Reading
Adam
Hochschild King Leopold’s Ghost Houghton
Mifflin Co. 1999