![]() |
|
How do we define the term "religion"?
Descriptive:
A descriptive definition is one which consists of whatever a given
person or group chooses to define as their religion, or accepts
as accurate descriptive statements of it: A descriptive definition
is a comprehensive listing of those facets in as complete and
accurate way possible.
Normative:
A normative definition is one which answers ultimate questions
of "ought" or "should" -- it seeks to determine
what should be the "true" religion to
live the best way. For example, a person may argue that the "true
religion" is Christianity, or Judaism, or Islam, or Sanatana
Dharma, or a specific type of Christianity, and so on.
Essential:
An essential definition is one which seeks to offer a comprehensive
definition which is the essence or root of all so-called religions,
e. g., "man's way of relating to the transcendent,"
which does not account for some traditions which operate as what
most consider as "religions" but do not posit a transcendent.
Functional:
A functional definition is one which describes religion in terms
of what it does or what its effect is.
Stipulative: A stipulative definition is one which is in keeping with descriptive reality, but which is agreed on in order to eliminate confusion.
In this course, we will use a stipulative definition. We will understand "religion" to mean "actions or beliefs pertaining to ultimate concerns."
A person is acting "religiously" if that person
When we think about what is truly real,
what one must do, and what existence really means,
then we are behaving religiously, by our definition.
Our Approach
We will try to study religion in a way that attempts to be as objective as possible. We will use a comparative approach common in the discipline called "History of Religions."
The History of Religions approach to the study of religion is to take a number of categories common to many forms of phenomena commonly understood as "religions," and then to trace those categories throughout history. The History of Religions approach is comparative, as well; we compare the answers to our questions for various religions.
By observing similarities and differences,
it adds to our fund of objective facts, and lets us understand
why some cultures or peoples respond similarly or differently
to various stimuli. Thus, we are seeking to learn how to describe
sympathetically various religious systems, not to define or to
understand them on their deepest levels.
The categories we will use are based
on our stipulative definition of religion:
Ultimate Concern and Goals
What concerns a particular group ultimately? What does it mean
to be "good" or "saved" according to them?
What are their theories of an afterlife?
Means to one's goals
What must a person do to accomplish the goal? what are the religious
observances performed? Are particular structures of religious
authority and law required? Is mysticism or meditation an acceptable
means?
Authority/Government
What is the proper relationship between secular and religious
powers? Are they viewed separately, or is there crossover?
What kind of secular and religious hierarchies are considered
appropriate? What is the role of Scripture and Tradition?
The Phenomenal World
What is the nature of this world and our phenomenal "reality"?
What is the importance of History?
Theories of Ultimate Reality
What is the view of the Sacred, or the Transcendent (viz. that
which is beyond or transcends the phenomenal realm)? Is
there no "Other" or Transcendent? What variations of
theology and religious practice are to be found within the religious
tradition?
Human Nature
What is the proper relation of the human to the Transcendent?
What is the relation of humans to each other, for example, in
terms of gender, class, and race? What is the role of human prophecy?
Human Predicament
What is the problem that faces humankind and keeps us from achieving
our ultimate goals?